September 17th, 2016
Source: Thomas Dworetzky, DotMed
Sustainability in the OR may be challenging, but as cost containment becomes more important in the modern push to improve the efficiency of health care delivery, it is a must.
In a 2013 HCB News article on sustainability, author Brian White, president of Stryker Sustainability Solutions, made the compelling case that, “the total value of third-party reprocessing extends beyond cost-savings. Reprocessing programs also divert waste and support sustainability initiatives within facilities. Let’s use the operating room as an example. Practice Greenhealth estimates that the OR generates 20 to 30 percent of an average hospital’s waste. Today, reprocessing is one of the most significant ways that ORs can reduce their environmental footprint.”
September 14th, 2016
Grow sustainability through upper-level buy-in
Source: HSM, July/August E-book
THE KEY TO GREENING HEALTHCARE
In healthcare, environmental stewardship can offer an alternative way to practice the Hippocratic Oath — to heal and do no harm. Hospitals can have a positive effect on both indoor and outdoor environments by using safer products, reducing air pollution, eliminating toxins, creating less waste, and using energy and water efficiently. But it doesn’t end there, because sustainability is about much more than just environmental stewardship.
HEALTHCARE’S UNIQUE ROLE IN SUSTAINABILITY. Our relationship with our environment is shifting. Historically, we have focused on the impact we have on the environment: our water systems, air quality and forests. There’s a new ideology centered on the connection between the environment and our health — how the air we breathe, the chemicals we use and the water we drink impact our wellbeing. In this new paradigm, the healthcare industry has a key opportunity and responsibility to lead this conversation…
Read More. (beginning on p. 18)
September 13th, 2016
The World Health Organization (WHO)’s “Global Model Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices Including IVDs” draft document, released this last July, includes recommendations for regulatory authorities to adopt a policy whereby SUD reprocessing is subject to the same standards as applied to original device manufacturers.
AMDR wholly supports and endorses the WHO approach as regulated SUD reprocessing has proven to curtail, if not stop, inappropriate and unregulated in-house reuse, and promote a proper, regulated marketplace for lower cost and environmentally responsible reprocessed and remanufactured SUDs.
Global Model Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices Including IVDs
Excerpt from Reprocessing of single use medical devices:
“In adopting a policy on the reprocessing of SUMDs, the regulatory authority should consider the following: reprocessing of a SUMD as labelled by its manufacturer is not permitted unless the reprocessed SUMD meets the same initial standards as those of the original manufacturer. In order to allow their reuse, a party that reprocesses and distributes medical devices labelled by their original manufacturer for single-use only will be held to the same requirements of safety, quality and performance as manufacturers of new devices. This applies equally to a health-care facility fully reprocessing single-use medical devices for reuse within its own facility…”
September 13th, 2016
Source: Laura Dyrda, Becker’s ASC Review
The reprocessed medical devices market is expected to grow over the next few years, according to a new report from Credence Research.
Here are six key trends:
1. The market was valued at $1.079 billion last year and is expected to reach $2.4 billion by 2022. The market is expanding at a 10.6 percent compound annual growth rate through 2022.
2. The main factors driving the market growth include:
• Pressure to reduce medical waste for environmental concerns
• Managing hospital expenditure
• Improved quality of reprocessed medical devices
3. The North American market is the largest regional market and accounts for more than 50 percent of the market share in 2015. North America is expected to continue dominating the market over the next six years…
September 13th, 2016
Source: Rick Dana Barlow, HPN Online
When it comes to progressing toward and implementing environmentally responsible contracting and purchasing of sustainable products and services, a small percentage of forward-thinking “green”-minded healthcare organizations have been making some waves.
Through their individual philosophies and projects, they have been carrying the flag for sustainability in healthcare, which they promote as fitting hand-in-glove from a missional standpoint.
Their efforts motivated and paved the way for propelling sustainability to the next level in a more prominent role.
Back in May, Practice Greenhealth and Health Care Without Harm put their green efforts into overdrive, tapping two veteran group purchasing organization executives to found Greenhealth Management. John Strong, former head of the heritage Premier Health Alliance (now part of Premier Inc.) and later Consorta (now part of HealthTrust), and Mary Starr, previously a key leader in Consorta, HealthTrust and University HealthSystem Consortium (now part of Vizient), used Greenhealth Management to launch Greenhealth Exchange, a supply chain support services organization designed for strategic sourcing, contracting and purchasing sustainable products and services for healthcare provider organizations that join it…
September 9th, 2016
Health system pays for lighting retrofit, building automation upgrade largely with green fund
Source: Jeff Ferenc, HFM Daily
Cleveland Clinic is wasting no time in making the $7.5 million green revolving fund (GRF) pay major financial dividends by launching ambitious energy-savings projects paid for, in large part, through the fund.
Touted as the largest of its kind in the health care field and one of the largest in any business sector in the nation when the green revolving fund was announced in May, Cleveland Clinic is moving quickly to increase its energy-efficiency index by investing in large-scale, energy-saving projects…
The GRF will help to drive Cleveland Clinic’s goal to reduce energy intensity by 20 percent by 2020. Through the end of 2015, Cleveland Clinic had reduced its energy demand by 12.3 percent across its 20 million square feet of facilities compared with a baseline year of 2010.
September 8th, 2016
Source: Ana B. Ibarra, California Healthline
It’s long been a problem for the nation’s hospitals: A staggering number of medical supplies — from surgical gloves to sponges to medications — go unused and are discarded after surgeries.
A recent study by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco has put a price tag on that waste: almost $1,000 per procedure examined at the academic medical center.
The research, published in May in the Journal of Neurosurgery, examined 58 neurosurgeries performed by 14 different surgeons at UCSF Medical Center, a leading academic hospital…
As health care costs continue to skyrocket, it is important to look for ways to contain them, said Dr. Michael Lawton, a neurosurgeon at UCSF and one of the study’s authors…
Some medical devices, whether used or unused during surgery, can be reprocessed by an FDA-approved third party company and sold back to the hospital for about half the original sales price, Lee explained. This allows hospitals to save money and cut down on the volume of disposable supplies that end up in landfill.
This strategy saved UCSF hospitals about $1.1 million over the past year, Lee said.
September 8th, 2016
Source: Adam Rubenfire, Modern Healthcare
Practice Greenhealth has made yet another move into supply chain with the expected launch of a tool that helps hospitals forecast the total cost of using and maintaining a product, beyond just the purchase price.
The Greenhealth Cost of Ownership Calculator will let hospitals compare the often-hidden costs that come with purchasing equipment, such as maintenance, energy, water use and disposal. The Reston, Virginia-based not-for-profit, which helps its hospital members implement sustainable best practices, hopes the tool will help hospitals see the benefit of “green products” in reducing long-term costs…
September 2nd, 2016
Source: Bill Scott, Healthcare Business Today
Single-use device (SUD) reprocessing is one of the top healthcare supply chain strategies used to reduce costs and optimize resources, with more than 3,000 U.S. hospitals purchasing reprocessed SUDs, according to the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors (AMDR). Some hospitals see savings of more than $600,000 annually through their recycling and redistribution initiatives. However, reaching that level of savings, and working to grow it year-over-year, requires internal support and frequent monitoring to analyze areas for added growth, as well as careful evaluations of potential roadblocks to reprocessing savings.
If you’re not sure if your new device contract may impact your ability to reprocess, visit AMDR’s dedicated resource to help health systems identify and address these types of tactics.
August 26th, 2016
To: AMDR Members
From: Dan Vukelich, President
Re: Surge of Anti-Reprocessing Contracting Practices
The mission at the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors (AMDR) includes promoting the financial and environmental benefits of regulated “single-use” device (SUD) reprocessing. AMDR is aware of certain types of contractual and otherwise misleading practices used by some medical device manufacturers which may purport to promote SUD reprocessing or reduce costs, but in fact, may result in less reprocessing and therefore less financial savings and environmental benefits to our healthcare partners.
Consistent with our mission, AMDR is pleased to announce the availability of a new online resource to address some of these challenges – http://sudreprocessing.amdr.org/. AMDR believes that our healthcare partners are entitled to a transparent and clear understanding of new contract terms regarding sales of SUDs and potential implications for reprocessing programs…
Full memo available here.